The Red-State/Blue-State narrative is a getting a bit tired. (QN) No human reality is so neatly divided. (Purple UMich) But every once in a while the electoral college color-coded score-card still helps tell the story. And never did a newspaper show its true Blue-State colors more obviously than did The New York Times in a recent book review of two new titles dealing with NASCAR. (Sunday Money, and Full Throttle).
Writing in an effete Blue-State voice, NYT reviewer Jonathan Mills’ money quote: NASCAR triggers among Blue-Staters “the kind of fearful trembling the citizens of Gaul felt as the Huns came thundering over the hills. To these (Blue-State) people, stock-car racing represents all that's unsavory about red-state America: fossil-fuel bingeing; lust for violence; racial segregation; run-away Republicanism; anti-intellectualism (how much brain matter is required to go fast and turn left, ad infinitum?); the corn-pone memes of God and guns and guts; crass corporatization; Toby Keith anthems; and, of course, exquisitely bad fashion sense. What's more, they simply don't get it. What's the appeal of watching . . . traffic?”
Instipundit justifiably tweeked the over-the-top elitism implied in the NYT for so completely dissing its down-market competitors for the hearts and minds of the people. (Also, Grim’s Hall). Still the NYT has its strengths. Editors paid attention to their sociology studies and absorbed the liberal arts argument that the principles of science applied in math and physical world can also be applied to human beings and their interactions for insights and truth. The NYT series elsewhere in the paper on Class in America is the best of the type, and the graphic treatment of its studies is well worth a long browse. Despite the insights that sociology can elicit, Quillnews doesn’t buy the NYT class arguments. The reason is that such a study model ignores the central human truths that social science abhor: the reality of faith and of individuals' beliefs about what is right and what is wrong, and as they actually function in the lives of the study subjects. (The year long NYT study upon which Blue-Staters would justify so much public policy measures only: income, education, wealth and occupation.) Intangibles such as faith or beliefs are rarely included in your average social science model, no matter how well designed, because this kind of faith and belief system is considered by any good social scientist as anti-intellectual and, well, for NASCAR lovers from Red-States.
(Editor’s aside: speaking of class and sociology, an example of the worst of this breed of sociologist is the recent appointment of a complete jerk as chairman of the Brooklyn College sociology department. This professor gets away with calling people of faith “retards.” How’s that for class?!)
It is precisely this elitist contempt that fuels the relentless drive of the Red-Stater’s political behavior, and is emblematic in NASCAR race fans who celebrate the sport of driving hard and fast in ovals to see who wins. It is the clarity of the contest, the heart and bravery required in the doing, and the simplicity of the result. The exquisite beauty of the sport’s structure is its appeal. If fans also get to rub shoulders with like-minded neighbors, imbibe, dance and socialize in uncomplicated settings while celebrating this sport so much the better. In these unpretentious settings the uncomplicated and direct appeal of product marketing is out there – like the bosomy star of Stacked – for all to see. The young men who drive these cars are celebrated for their driving prowess and their movie idol looks. In abundance are primary colors, deafening sounds and adrenalin pumping speed. Come on. It’s great.
NASCAR and its fans don’t do nuance. Nor do they seek the approval of "world opinion," multilaterialism, multiculturalism, relativism and an obsession with making sure you internalize and approve of the validity of the "other person's point of view." (Pinkerton) Nor do NASCAR fans concern themselves with the opinion of the landed, the coastal planters, the members-only country club set, the upper church knobs who are more than happy to delineate their society into upper, middle and lower classes, with gradations, ranks, positions and other methods of precise measurement as to who is not quite as worthy as them.
As an upper Blue-Stater might dismiss the clarity of a car race to see who drives fastest, so too do they ignore the clarity of right and wrong, and the simple imperatives of achieving victory. The Red-Stater sees the enemy and knows his duty. He ignores the opinions of the fashionably positioned and schooled; what persons with time on their hands think or say. When an enemy lurks, academic credentials mean nothing; character is all.
It is here that the Blue-Staters get in trouble, as the current political embodiment of the Red-Stater – Bush 43 – is behaving in the central conflict of our time in a way that is achieving the enemy’s destruction and preparing for a victory by righteousness.
Evidence that Bush 43’s forthright and decisive actions are working has been ignored by too many Blue-Staters. (VDH, WSJ, LAT) Some are beginning to get the picture, and speak up. (HT: Powerline) But these are few. The Blue-State high priesthood – the major institutions of the MSM – are exposed as frauds (USNews JLeo) running marginal businesses their customers no longer patronize. (VDH, BuzzMachine) Many still look on as in snotty contempt as the world becomes – to them – more vulgar and crude as it celebrates the common sense of average people who have faith in themselves and their God, know what they believe and are willing to drive fast to victory.